A new student loan system on the horizon in Texas?
Students who have interest in student loans may want to take note of this article, as it addresses a proposed amendment to the Texas Constitution that would change the way students attain financial aid at the state level.
The ballot text for the proposed amendment to be voted on today (Nov.8) reads as follows: "The constitutional amendment
providing for the issuance of general obligation bonds to the State of Texas to finance educational loans to students."
Aaah! Ring the constitutional amendment alarm! The oil-slick fat cats in cowboy hats that comprise the Texas Legislature are after our freedom again! Aaaah!
Except for the fact that they're not, and the upcoming popular vote to amend the constitution of Texas is designed to increase accessibility to financial aid without raising the amount of money borrowed by the state [taxpayers] to do so.
How, you may ask, is it possible for such a system to exist?
The solution lies in the way our state issues bonds to finance student loans. Let's take a look at the issue.
At this point, the Texas legislature, by popular vote, has issued $1.86 billion in bonds for the purpose of increasing the accessibility of higher education. Once those bonds are paid in full, voter consent is necessary to issue new bonds. Today, only $275 million in those bonds are unissued and accessible. I just received $1,000 of that this morning. Tick-tock. To add to the situation, the current congressional session is set to cut the amount of state money dedicated to financial aid.
Senator Royce West D-Dallas, drafted a solution to this dilemma in the form of Proposition 3: Automatically replace bonds that have been paid in full with new bonds for new borrowers. The debt ceiling remains unchanged, while new students seeking financial aid will be able to access loans with no hiccups in the bureaucracy due to there being no bonds left until an expensive popular vote is carried out.
Critics of this proposition cite the alleviation of voter responsibility in the issuance of bonds as an infringement upon voter rights, and cite it as an example of taxation without representation.
Whether Proposition 3 is a boon for loan distribution efficiency or an attack on taxpayer rights is for you, the voter, to decide on November 8.
Get Top Stories Delivered Weekly
From Around the Web
More Richland Chronicle News Articles
Recent Richland Chronicle News Articles
Discuss This Article
MOST POPULAR RICHLAND CHRONICLE
GET TOP STORIES DELIVERED WEEKLY
FOLLOW OUR NEWSPAPER
LATEST RICHLAND CHRONICLE NEWS
RECENT RICHLAND CHRONICLE CLASSIFIEDS
FROM AROUND THE WEB
- Giving the Elderly a Lift -- In Their Home
- 4-H Grown: Alumni Asked to Stand Up and Support STEM...
- Haven't Tried Sardines? Try These
- Weatherizing Your Home Can Mean Big Benefits
- 10 Tips to Stay Safe During Spring Break
- 10 Tips for Staying Safe During Spring Break
- 3 Things to Know Before Ride-Booking a Car
- For Advanced Heart Failure Patients, There Is Hope
- Bringing Chiropractic to the Little League
- Singapore Pastor Kong Hee Maintains Innocence, Gains...
COLLEGE PRESS RELEASES
- Study Finds College-age Millennials Hopeful for the Future, Worry about Student Loans and Overspending
- RetailMeNot Helps Students Save Money on Spring Break Travel
- Visit Virtual Study Abroad Fair on February 25 to explore study abroad options and win prizes
- Students kill three birds with one stone
- Sodexo Expands Ongoing Commitment to More Humane Supply Chain through its Comprehensive Animal Welfare Policy